6.|FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES
1.
Which among the following countries has not codified the Fundamental Rights :
(a) United
States
(b)
England
(c) India
(d)
Australia
2. The
foundation of individual rights in England may be said to be negative :
(a) in the
sense that an individual has right and freedom to take whatever action he
likes, solong as he does not violate any rule of the ordinary law of land
(b) in the sense that an individual has right
and freedom to be determined by the Supreme Court (c) in the sense that the
State can not impose any reasonable restriction on the individual Executive
(d) None of the above
3.while
the English were anxious to protect individual rights of the citizens. in the
absence of written constitution in England or codification from the abuse of
absolute crown, the framers of Američan fundamental Rights, the individual
libertỷ is secured by coņstitution were apprehensive of tyranny of Legislature
(a) The
individual Fundamental Rights in England is not secured only
[b] The
individual liberty is secured by thế Parliament
(c) The individual rights is secured by the
crown
(d) None
of the above
4. Who
among the following is considered to be the guardian of Congress as
unconstitutionål on the ground of of individual rights? Contravention of any
provision of the Bill ofRights
(a)
Parliament
-(b)
Judiciary
(c) It is
beyond the competence of the legislature to modify or
(d) Prime Minister adjust any of the
fundamental rights in view of any
6. The
framers of the Indian Constitution borrowed the concept of Fundamental Rights
from the :
(a)
Constitution of Canada
(b) Constitution of U.S.A
. (c)
Irish Constitution
(d) All
the above
7.
Under the British rule the Indian people enjoyed :
-(a) No
Fundamental Rights
(b) Some Fundamental Rights
(c) A long
list of Fundamental Rights
(d) Directive Principles only
8. In
1928, a report was prepared and fundamental rights were demanded under the
leadership of :
(a)
Maulana Azad
(b)
Motilal Nehru
(c)
Mahatma Gandhi
(d)
Jawahar Lal Nehru
9. Who
headed the committee appointed by the constituent assembly to finalise the
fundamental rights of Indian citizens?
(a) B.R.
Ambedkar
(b)
Jawahar Lal Nehru
(c) Mahatma Gandhi
(d) Sardar
Patel
10. The
Fundamental rights granteed to the Indian citizens by the constitution are so
called because :
a) They
are superior to ordinary Laws
(b) They are vital for the development of
individual's personality
(c) They can be altered only through an
amendment to the Constitution
(d) All the above
11. The
Fundamental Rights :
(a) formed
a part of the original constitution
(b) were added by the Parliament in 1952
(c) were
added by the amendment of constitution
(d) were added by 42nd amendment of
constitution
12. The
Fundamental Rights have :
(a) a moral force behind them
(b) a force of the public opinion
(c) a
legal force behind them
(d) None of the above
13. The
Fundamental rights of Indian Constitution are enshrined in :
(a) The
preamble
(b) Part III of the Constitution
(c) Part IV of the Constitution
(d) Part VA of the Constitution
14.
Parliament of India cannot be said to be sovereign in the English sense of
legal omnipotence :
(a)
parliament is created and limited by a written constitution enables to legislate only subject to the limitation and
prohibition imposed by the constitution
(b) These
limitation, the Supreme Court and the High Courts are competent to declare a
law as unconstitutional and void
(c) both (a) and (b) are correct
(d) both
(a) and (b) are incorrect
15. The
Fundamental Rights enshrined in the Indian Constitution are :
(a) absolute in nature
(b)
absolute but some are restricted
(c)
restricted and limited with reasonable grounds
(d) None of the above
16.
Fundamental Rights under Indian Constitution distinguished from American Bill
of Rights :
(a) while
the declarations in American Bill of rights are absolute, in India this power
has been expressly restricted & limited with reasonableness
(b) while
in America the power of the state to impose restrictions upon the fundamental
rights of the individual in the collective interest had to evolved by the
judiciary - in India having the power of judicial review in the hands of the
judiciary to determine the reasonableness of the restrictions imposed by Legislature
(c) both
(a) and (b) are the correct distinction of the fundamental rights under Indian
Constitution and American Bill of Rights
(d) both
(a) and (b) are not a correct distinction of the fundamental rights under
Indian Constitution and American Bill of Rights
17. The
original constitution divided fundamental rights into seven categories but now
they are divided into :
(a) Four
categories
(b) Five
categories
(c) Six
categories
(d) Three
categories
18.
Which one of the following rights was deleted from the list of fundamental
rights after inauguration of the Constitution :
(a) Right against exploitation
(b) Right to freedom of religion
(c) Right to property
(d) Right
to constitutional remedies
19. A
Right to Property was deleted from the list of fundamental rights by :
(a) 24th constitutional amendment
(b) 39th
constitutional amendment
(c) 42nd constitutional amendment
(d) 44th constitutional amendment
20.A
Right to Property granted under Articles 19(1)(F) and 31 was omitted by 44th
Amendment Act, 1978 and new Article was added as persons not to be deprived of
property :
(a)
Article 300
(b)
Article 300A
(c)
Article 301
(d)
Article 301A
21.At
present the Right to Property is merely a
:
(a) Legal
Right
(b) Moral
Right
(c) Natural Right
(d) Civil
Rights
22.which
one set of the following Articles deals with the fundamental rights :
(a) Articles 12-35
(b)
Articles 14-31
(c) Articles 12-31
(d)
Articles 15-35
23.Fundamental
Rights are binding :
(a) on
Local Govt. only
(b) on
Provincial Govt. only
(c) on Central Govt. only
(d) on Central Govt.,
24.State
Govt., all local or other authorities within the territory of India or under
the control of Govt.The net result of the 44th Amendrament wherein the right to
property delęted from the chapter of fundamental rights inflicted upon the
right to property is/are :
(a) If any
body's property is taken away without the authority of law or in contravention
of a law, the aggrieved individual shall have no right to move the Supreme
Court under Article 32 (Right to constitutional remedy)
(b) If a Legislature makes law depriving a
person his property, he can not challenge the reasonableness
(c) By
deleting the fundamental rights to property is that it was only being converted
in to a legal right
(d) All the above
25.By
which amendment parliament acquired the right to amend Fundamental Rights :
(a) 24th Constitutional Amendment
(b) 23rd Constitutional Amendment
(c) 42nd
Constitutional Amendment
(d) 40th Constitutional Amendment
26.Under
which Article of the Constitution state as - "The state shall not make any
law which takes away or abridges the rights conferred by this part and any law
made in contravention of this clause shall, to the extent of the contravention,
be void".
(a) Article 15 (c) Article 13 clause 2
(b)
Article 19 (d) Article 21
27.In
Kesavanand Bharti v/s State of Kerala case it was heldthat :
(a)
Parliament could not amend fundamental rights
(b)
Parliament could amend only some part of the Fundamental Rights
(c) 24th
Amendment was valid and Parliament could amend Fundamental Rights
(d) None
of the above
28.The
24th Amendment was challenged in which one of the following case :
(a)
Kesavanand Bharti v/s State of Kerala
(b) Golak
Nath v/s State of Punjab
(c)
Minerva Mills v/s Union of India
(d) Gopalan v/s Union of India
29.In
Shakri Prasad v/s Union of India and in Sajjam Singh v/s State of Rajasthan
case, it was held by the Supreme Court
(a)
Parliament could amend Fundamental Rights
(b) Parliament could not amend all Fundamental
Rights
-(c)
Parliament could amend some Fundamental Rights only
(d) None of the above
30.In
Golak Nath v/s State of Punjab, the Supreme Court overruled the decisions held
in :
(a) Ramesh Thapar v/s State of Madras
(b) Shankari Prasad v/s Union of India
(c) Sajjan Singh v/s State of Rajasthan
-{d) Both
(b) and (c)
31.In
Golak Nath v/s State of Punjab, it was decided by the Supreme Court's 11 Judges
Bench that :
(a)
Fundamental Rights were like ordinary laws
(b) Fundamental Rights could be amended by the
parliament
(c)
Fundamental Rights had been given a transcendental position by the
constitution, so that no authority functioning under the constitution including
parliament exercising the amending power under Article 368, was competent to
amend
(d)
Parliament was sovereign
32.The
Golak Nath v/s State of Punjab case with regard to the Fundamental Rights took
place in :
(a)
1964(b) 1966
(c)
1965(d) 1967
33.Until
the Golak Nath v/s State of Punjab the Supreme Court had been holding :
(a) No
part of our constitution was unamendable and the parliament, in compliance with
the requirements of Art.
a)368
(Amendments) amend any provision including fundamental rights
(b) No part of our constitution was amendable
(c) Parliament was sovereign and omnipotent
(d) None of the above 40.
34. By
the 24th Amendment Act, 1971 Articles 13 and Articles 368 were amended to make
it clear :
(a) That fundamental rights were amendable under
the procedure laid down in Article 368
(b) That 24th Amendment Act, 1971 over ridded
the majority decision of the Supreme Court in GolakNath v/s State of Punjab
(c) Both
(a) and (b) are correct
(d) Both (a) and (b) are false
35. The
supreme court in which case upheld the validity of 24th amendment and overruled
the Golak Nath v/s State of Punjab
(a)
Kesavanand Bharti v/s State of Kerala
(b) Brij Bhushan v/s State of Delhi
(c) Ramesh Thapar v/s State of Madras
(d) None of the above
36. The
case Kesavanand Bharti v/s State of Kerala were decided by Supreme Court in :
(a) 1971
(b) 1972
(c) 1973
(d) 1974
37. In
the case Kesvanand Bharti v/s State of Kerala it was held by the Supreme Court:
(a) That
it is competent for parliament to amend fundamental rights under Article 368
(b) It does not make any exception in favour
of Fundamental Rights nor does Art. 13 comprehend Acts amending the
constitution itself
(c) It
laid down that there implied limitations on the power to amend and that power
cannot be used to alter basic structure of the constitution
(d) All the above
38. The
Fundamental Rights secured to the individual are:
(a)
limited on the state action only
(b) means to protect persons against the
conduct of private persons
(e) means to protect persons against the
public action
(d) all
the above are correct
39.
which Article of the Indian Constitution defines 'the state
(a)
Article 12
b) Article
13
(c)
Article 14
(d)
Article 15
40.|
The doctrine of "Basic Structure" of the constitution we relate
applied by supreme Court in
(a) Minerva Millsv/s Union
a)Gandhi
v/s Union of India
c) hussainara
Begam v/s St
d) None of
the abóve/ate of Bihar
41.
which among the following is not a fundamental rights been eliminated by the
44th
(a) Right to equality
b) Right to freedom
9) Right
against exploitation
(d) Right to property
42.Right
to Property has Amendment in the year :
(a) 1972 (c)||1978
(b) 1974 (d) 1980
41.
which among the following fundamentalrights is/are available to any Person on
the soil of India citizen or foreigner
(a) Equality before law
(b)under Article 14 Protection of life
and-Personal liberty against authority of law guaranteed under law
c) Right against
exploitation guaranteed under Article 23 of
(d) All
the above
42.Freedom
of religion available to :
(a) Citizen of India only
(b) Foreigners only
(c) Any
person
(d) citizen as well as foreigners
43.the right against exploitation guarnted by the constitution have underArticle 23 of
(a) Citizen of India only (b) Foreigners only
(e), any
person (d) None citizen a well as foreigners
44.No,
which among the following Fundamental rights only tothe"Rights is/are protection
from discrimination, On the ground ofreligion,race, Caste, sex or place Place
of birth guarantee under Article 15 of the constuitution
(b)
Equality of opportunity in matters of|-guaranteed under Artičle 16 öf the employment
equal
protection of law guaranteed
45.freeom
guaranteed under Article 25 have been
(a) Freedom of speech, assembly, association
movement, residence and profession guaranteed under Article 19
(b) All
the above
45.which
among the following fundamental rights are not available any person on the soil
of India :
(a)
Cultural and educational rights at minorities guaranteed under Article 30
(b)
Protection in respect of conviction against ex post facto laws, double
punishment and self incrimination guaranteed under Article 20
(c)
Freedom as to attendance at religious instruction or worship in state
educational institutions guaranteed under Article 28
(d) Right
against exploitation guaranteed under Article 23 of
the
Constitution
46.Which
among the following fundamental rights is/are exclusively confine for citizens
of India :
(a)
Equality before Law & equal protection of law
(b) Equality of opportunity in matters of
public employment
(c) Right against exploitation
(d)
Freedom of religion
47.Freedom
as to payment of taxes for the promotion of any particular religion guaranteed
under Art. 27 is available to :
(a)
Citizen of India only
(b) Aliens
only
(c)
Citizen as well as Aliens
(d) None
of the above
48.Equality
before Law and equal Protection of Law guaranteed under Article 14 of the
Constitution granted only to :
(a)
Citizens of India
(b) Foreigners
(c) Both
citizens as well as foreigners
(d) None
49.Freedom
of speech, assembly, association, movement residence and profession guaranteed
under Article 19 is available only to :
(a) The
citizen of India
(b)
Foreigners
(c) Both
citizens as well as foreigners
(d) None
50.Some
of the fundamental rights are negatively worded, as prohibitions to the state
e.g. Art. 14 says - "The state shall not deny to any person equality
before law - similar are the provisions of Articles:
(a)
Article 15(1)(b) Article 16(2) (c) Article 28(1)(d) All the above
51.Protection
of the life and personal liberty against action without authority of law
guaranteed under Article :
(a) 20(b) 21 (c) 22(d) 23
52.All
the Fundamental Rights are available against the 'state action'. The State will
include :
(a) Not
only the Executive and Legislative organs of the union and the States, but also
local bodies
(b) Any
authority or body of persons exercising the power to issue orders, rules,
bye-laws or regulations
(c)
Municipal Authorities, Board, universities power to issue statutory rules or exercising governmental powers
(d) All the above
53.In
case of violation of rights by one individual to another individual :
(a)
Constitutional remedy is available
(b) The
ordinary legal remedies are available
(c) Right
to constitutional remedy granted under Article 32 is available
(d) None
of the above
54.There
are certain rights included in Part III which are available not only against
the state but also against private individuals, which among the following
rights granted against private individuals
(a)
Equality in regard to access to and use of places of public resort, guaranteed
under Article 15(2)
(b)
Prohibition of untouchability guaranteed under Article 17
(c) Prohibition of employment of children in
hazardous employment guaranteed under Article 24
(d) All
the above
55.rights
available against private individual Equality before law and equal protection
is guaranteed under Article :
(a) 14(b)
15 (c) 16(d) 17
56. The
expression 'equality before the law' and 'equal protection of laws seems to be
identical, but, in fact, they mean different things :
(a) while equality before the law is a
negative concept, equal protection of law is positive concept
(b) while
equality before law implies absence of any special privilege by reason of
birth, creed or the like in favour of any individual and the equal subjection
of all classes to the ordinary law, equal
protection of law implying the right to equality of treatment in equal
circumstances
(c) both (a) and (b) are true differentiation
(d) both (a) and (b) are incorrect
differentiation
57.
Equality before law means :
(a) No man
is above the law of the land
(b) Every person, whatever be his rank or
status, is subject tothe ordinary law
(c) There
is no distinction between officials and private citizens
(d) All
the above
58.
Equality before law is the second corollary of the Dicey's concept of :
(a) Equal
protection of law
(b) Rule of law
(c) Equality before law
(d) None
59.
There are certain exceptions are recognised to the rule of law/equality before
law in the public interest available to :
(a) The
President or the Governor
(b) The
Prime Minister
(c) The
Chief Justice of India
(d) All
the above
60.
Equal Protection of laws means :
(a) among
equals, the law should be equal and equally administrated and like should be
treated alike
(b) Equal
Protection required affirmative action by the state towards unequals by
providing facilities and opportunities
(c) The
guarantee of 'equal protection is a guarantee of treatment of persons in equal
circumstances, permitting differentiation in different circumstances
(d) All
the above
61. The
guarantee of equal protection includes:
(a)
absence of any arbitrary discrimination
(b)
classification must be reasonable and rational
(c) the
decision making process must be transparent, just fair and open
(d) all
the above
62.
Protective discrimination in favour of SCs and STs is a partof constitutional
scheme of social and economic justice
(a) to integrate
them into the national mainstream so as to establish and integrated social
order with equal dignity of person
(b)
because they are privileged persons
(c) They
participated in freedom struggle effectively
(d) None
of the above
63.
Article 16 of the Constitution restricts of public discrimination namely :
(a) matter at the disposal of the state
(b) employment under the state
(c)
granting aids to the down trodden citizen
(d) all of the above
64.Article
15 prohibits discrimination on the ground of religion, race, caste, sex or
place of birth - the prohibitions against discrimination, however, would not
preclude the state from :
(a) making special provision for women &
children
(b) making
special provision for the advancement of any socially and educationally
backward class of citizens for the SCs and STS
(c) both (a) and (b) precluded
(d) the
state can not make special provisions even for women, children and SCs and STs
65.Though
discrimination on the ground of caste only is prohibited by clause (1) of
Article 15 it would be permissible under : (a) clause (2) of Article 15 (b)
clause (3) of Article 15 (c) clause (4) of Article 15 (d) clause (5) of Article
15Article 15 (4) envisages the policy of compensatory or protective
discrimination but it should be reasonable and consistent with the :
(a) Public
interest
(b)
National interest
(c)
Interest of community and society as whole
(d) All the above
66.Article
16 describes equality of opportunity in the matters of public employment – this
equality is to be observed by the :
(a)
appointment to the public services/public employment
(b) appointment to the private employment
(c) appointment to the public & private
appointment
(d) None of the above
67.Article
16 bars discrimination not only in the matters of initial appointment but also
of :
(a)
Promotion
(b)
Demotion
(c)
Termination
(d) All
the above
68.Reservation
in favour of backward classes in public employment is permissible under :— (a)
clause (2) of Article 16 (b) clause (3) of Article 16 (c) clause (4) of Article
16 (d) clause (5) of Article 16 Residence within the state may be laid down by
the parliament as a condition for particular class of employment of appointment
under any state or other local authority by:
(a) clause (1) of Article 16
(b) clause
(2) of Article 16
(c) clause
(3) of Article 16
(d) clause
(4) of Article 16
69. A
nine Judges Bench of Supreme court has in Indra Sawhney v/s Union of
India(Popularly known as the Mandal Commission Case) laid down
: (a) The reservationsContemplated in Article 16(4) should
not exceed 50%
(b) The
reservation of posts under Article16(4) is confined to initial appointment only
(c)
Identification of backward classes is Subject to judicial review
(d) All
the above.
70.For
the furtherance of social equality, the constitution provides for the abolition
of evil of“untouchability" under Article :
(a) 17
(b) 18
(c) 19
(d) 20
81. The Parliament has enacted the Untouchability
(Offence) Act, 1955 prescribing the punishment for this offence which has been
renamed as the protection of Rights Act, 1955 in the year :
(a) 1977
(b) 1976
(c) 1979
(d) 1981
71..
The Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955 declares certain acts of offence, when
done on the ground of ‘untouchability" and prescribes the punishment för :
(a)
refusing admission to any person to public institution, such as hospital,
dispensary, educational institution;
(b)
preventing any persons from worshiping or offering prayers În any place of
public worship; (c) subjecting any person toany disability with regard to
access to any shop, public resturant, hotel or public entertainment or with
regard to the use ofany reservoir, tap or other Sources of water, road,
cremation ground or any other place where services are rendered to public;
(d) All
the above acts are punishable under the provision of Protection of Civil Rights
Act, 1955
72. The
penal sanction has been enhanced by providing than in case of subsequent
conviction, the punishment may range from –
(a) one
to two years imprisonment
(b) 6
months to one yeảr imprisonment
(c) 3 months to 6 months imprisonment
(d) 1 months to 3 months imprisonment
84. A
person convicted of the offence of‘untouchability' shall be disqualified for :
(a) election for the post of President of
India
(b) election to the Union or a State Legislature
(c) public appointment
(d)
private appointment
85.During
the ‘British Rule' there was power to center 'titles' by the Govt. for
imperialistic purposes and for corrupting public life. The Constitution of
India seeks to prevent sucň abuse by prohibiting the state from conferring any
title at all. The provision is incorporated under Article :
(a) 16(b)
17
(c) 18(d)
21
86.The
six fundamental rights in the nature of "freedom' granted to the citizens
by the Constitution of India under Article :
(a) 17(b)
18
(c) 19(d)
20
87.The
Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1).
This freedom is subject to seasonable restrictions imposed by the state
relating to :
(a)
defamation
(b)
contempt of court
(c) decency and morality
(d) all
the above
Note :
In addition to the above three subjects. Five othersubjects
88. to
the reasonable restrictions i.e.security of the state, friendly relations with
foreign state; incitement of an offence; public order; maintenance of sovereignty
and integrity of India.Decency or
morality includes :
(a) Sexual
morality;
(b)
Non-conformity with the current standards of behaviour or propriety;
(c)
Seeking votes in an election on thegrounds of the candidate's religion in a
secular state, is against the norms of decency & propriety.
(d) All
the above
89.Freedom
of speech and expression cannot confer upon an individual :
(a) a
licence to abuse others in the name of freedom of speech
(b) a
licence to legal and moral acts by incite others to overthrow the establish
Govt. by democratic methods
(c) a
licence to use this right not to voilate the another's right to freedom of expression
(d) all
the above
90.The
freedom of assembly is subject to the qualification that :
(a) It
must be violent with arms.
(b) It must be peaceful and without arms.
(c) It must be against the interest of state.
(d) It must be against public order.
91.All
the citizens have the right to form association or unions, but subject to
reasonable restrictions imposed by the state in the interest of :
(a) Public
order or morality.
(b) Sovereignty and integrity of India.
(c) Security of the state.
(d) All the
above.
92.Every
citizen have the right to move freely throughout the territory of India or to
reside and settle in any part of the country subject to the restrictions
imposed by the state in the interest of :
(a) The
general public;
(b) For the protection of any Schedule Tribes;
(c) For (a) & (b) restriction shall be
imposed;
(d) None of the above.
93.Every
citizen has the right to practice any profession or to carry on any occupation,
trade or business but :
(a)
Subject to any law laid down qualifications for carrying on any profession or
technical occupation.
(b) Without any specific qualification for any
professional or technical occupation.
(c) Without considering the interest of
general public.
(d)
Without imposing any reasonable restrictions.
94.Which
among the following statement is true :
(a)
Article 19 right to freedom does not containany limitations to the rights.
(b)
Article 19 of the Constitution, there is a distinct clause attached to each of
the right declared, containing the limitation or restrictions.
(c)
Limitations or restrictions has to be invent by the courts to impose on the
rights.
(d) All
the above.
95.A
law which may be made by the state under any of the'specific grounds, such as
public order, defamation, contemptof the court:
(a) Can be
challenged as unconstitutional.
(b) Cannot
be challenged as unconstitutional where the restrictions imposed by the law can
be held to be “unreasonable” by the court of law.
(c) Both
the statements (a) and (b) are true.
(d) Both
the statements (a) and (b) are untrue.
96.The
Supreme Court has held in examining the reasonableness of a statutory
provision, whether it violated the fundamental right guaranteed under Article
19, one has to keep in mind :
(a) The Directive Principles of State Policy.
(b) The restrictions must not be arbitrary or
of an excessive nature, going beyond the requirement of the interest of the
general public.
(c)
Prevailing social values as also social needs which are intended to be
satisfied by restrictions. (d) All the above.
97.In
which case the Supreme Court held that “a restriction is reasonable only when
there is a proper balance between the right of the individual and those of the
society”.
(a)
Express Newspapers v/s Union of India.
(b) Virendra v/s State of Punjab.
(c) Dwarka Prasad v/s State of U.P.
(d) None
of the above.
98.A
restriction is unreasonable, if it is imposed in a manner which violates :
(a) Law of
God.
(b) The
Principles of natural justice.
(c) Directive Principles of Govt. Policy
. (d) None
of the above.
99.The
question of reasonableness of restriction should be determined from :
(a) The
Substantive(b) Procedural
(c) Both
the above(d) None of the above
100.Freedom
of the Press guaranteed by the Constitution underArticle :
(a)
Article 19.
(b) There
is no specific provisions in our constitution guaranteeing the freedom of
press.
(c) The
freedom of press included in the wider freedom of speech & expression which
is guaranteed by Article 19(1)(a).
(d)
Freedom of Press has not granted by our Constitution.
101.Freedom
of expression means
: (a)
Freedom of expression of one’s view only.
(b) Freedom of expression of other views only.
(c) Freedom of expression means freedom to
express not onlyone’s own views but also views of others
(d) None of the above.
102.Freedom
of Press is not an absolute freedom and is subject to the limitations contained
in :
(a) Clause
(1) of the Article 19
(b) Clause (2) of the Article 19
(c) Clause (3) of the Article 19
(d) None
of the above
Note :
Laws may be passed by State imposing reasonable restrictions on the freedom of
the 103.press in the interests of the security of the state, the sovereignty and
integrity of India, friendly relations with foreign states, public order,
decemcy or morality or for the prevention of contempt of court, đefamation or
incitement of an offence.The press in
India : (a) Has provided special privileges.
(b) Has no
special privileges and it is as same as that of an
104.ordinary
Citizens under Article 19(1)(a).
(c) Special provision has been made by Article
19.
(d) None
of the above.
105.The
Press, as such, has no special privileges in India. But in view of the
guarantee of freedom of expression it would not be legitimate for the state :
(a) To
subject the press to laws which take away or abridge the freedom of expression
or which would curtail circulation;
(b) To single out the press for laying upon it
excessive and prohibitive burdens which would
restrict the circulation;
(c) To
impose a specific tax upon the pressed liberately calculated to limit the circulation of information.
(d) All the above.
106.The
Press is not immune from :
(aj The
ordinary forms of taxation.
(b) The
application of the general laws relating to industrial relations.
(c) The
regulation of the conditions of service ofemployees.
(d) All
the above.
107.When
a proclamation of emergency is made :
(a) Right
of freedom became more active.
(b) Right
of freedom guaranteed under Article remains suspended.|
(c) Right
of freedom remains as it is.
(d) None
of the above.
108.Article
20 guarantees protection in certain respects against conviction for offences,
by prohibiting :
(a)
Retrospective criminal legislation,commonly known as expost facto legislation.
(b) Double
jeopardy or punishment for the same offence more than once.
(C) Compulsion to give self-incriminating
evidence.
(d) All
the above.
109.Which
among the following is/are true statements :
(a) A
legislature shall not be competent to make a criminal law restrospective to
provide that a person may be convicted for an act which was not an offence
under the law in force at the time of commission of that act.
(b) An
accused may be sentenced with a penalty greater than that which might have been
inflicted under the law in force.
(c) A
legislature can enact restrospective laws.
(d) A
legislature can enact prospective as well as restrospective laws.
110.The
expression ‘double jeopardy' which means double punishment for the same offence
is prohibited by clause (2) of Article 20 is used in :
(a) American Law
(b)
Canadian Law
(c) English Law
(d) None of the above
111.which
read as “No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more
than once' refers to :
(a)
Judicial punishment
(b)
Punishment by Panchayat
(c)
Punishment by Private People
(d) None
of the above
112.Article
20(2) does not give immunity from proceedings other than proceedings before a
court of law or a judicial tribunal; A Govt. servant who has been punished for
an offence in a court of law may yet be subjected to departmental proceedings
for the same offence; or conversely - this verdiet was given by Supreme Court
in :
(a)
Venkataraman v/s Union of India
(b) Maqbool v/s State of Bombay
(c)
Gopalan v/s State of Madras
(d) Kesavanand Bharti v/s State of Kerala
113.Clause
(3) Article 20 provides the immunity from self incrimination which refers :
(a) to any
objects like medical examination
(b) to any documents like specimen signature
(c) to the articles seized from the possession
of accused
(d) no person can be compelled to furnish any
kind of evidence in the nature of a communication
114.The
immunity from self-incrimination guaranteed by clause(3) of Article 20 :
(a) does
not extend to civil proceedings
(b) can
not be claim at general inquiry or investigation on the ground that his
statement may at some late stage lead to an accusation
(c) does not extend to a proceeding other than
criminal
(d) All the above
115.
Which among the following Articles deals with the protection of life and personal
liberty :
(a)
Article 19
(b)
Article 21
(c) Article 23
(d)
Article 25
116.
Which Article of the Constitution provides protection against arbitrary arrest
and detention :
(a)
Article 20(b)
(b)
Article 22
(c)
Article 18
(d)
Article 24
117. In
which of the following cases the supreme court held that, if a competent
legislature make a law providing that a person may be deprived of his liberty
in cērtain circumstances and in a certain manner, the validity of law could not
be challenged in a court of law on the ground that the law is unreasonable
unfair andunjust :
(a) Menka Gandhi v/s Union of India
(b)
Gopalan v/s State of Madras
(c)
Minerva Mills v/s Union of India
(d) Indira
Sawhney v/s Union of India
118. In
Gopalan v/s State of Madras, the majority of our Supreme Court propounded the
view that by adopting the expression :
(a)
Procedure established by law
(b) Due process of law
(c) Both
the above
(d) None
of the above
119.
The Supreme Court has delivered a Landmark Judgement in Menka Gandhi v/s Union
of India, while interpreting Article 21 which among the following is/are true
with thế
Judgement
of Menka Gandhi v/s Union of India :
(a) The
expression of ‘personal liberty' in Article 21 is of the widest amplitude,
covering a variety of rights of which some have been included in Article 19.
(b) A law
made by the state which seeks to deprive a person of his personal liberty must
prescribe aprocedure for such deprivation which must not be arbitrary, unfair
or unreasonable.
(c) A law
depriving a person of his liberty, it follows that such law shall be invalid if
it violates the principles of natural justice.
(d) All
the above.
120.
Which among the following is/are true about protection against arbitrary arrest
and detention :
(a) No
person who is arrested shall be detained in custody without being informed, as
soon as may be, of the grounds for such arrest;
(b) No such person shall be denied the right
to consult, and to be defended by, a legal practitioner of his choice;
(c) Every
person who is arrested and detained in custody shall be produced before the
nearest magistrate within a period of 24 hours of arrest;
(d) All
the above.
121.
Right of protection against arbitrary arrest and detention are not available to
:
(a) an
enemy alien;
(b) a
person arrested or detained under law providing for preventive detention;
(c) in
case of (a) and (b);
(d) none
of the above.
122.
The Constitution of India itself authorises the legislature to make laws
providing for -
(a)
reasons connected with the security of a state/security of India connected with
Defence, Foreign Affairs.
(b)
maintenance of public order.
(c) the
interest of community.
(d) All
the above mentioned reasons.
123.
Under the preventive detentions :
(a) a
person should be detained or imprisoned without trial.
(b) trial has to be completed within a month.
(c) trial to be held by special court.
(d) even the individual have right of personal
liberty.
124.
When a person has been arrested under a law of
preventive detention?
(a) the government is entitled to detain
suchperson in custody only 24 hours.
(b) the
government is entitled to detain such person in custody only 15 days.
(c) the government is entitled to detain such
person in custody only 3 months.
(d) the
government is entitled to obtain such person in custody only 6 months.
124. If
a detention is being sought more than 3 months it must :
(a) be
tried by the competent court.
(b) obtain
a report from an advisory board who will examine the papers submitted by the
government and by the accused.
(c)
preventive detention cannot be extended more than 3 months in any case.
(d) be produced before the High Court of
concern state.
125: A
person detained under preventive detention :
(a) must have the earliest opportunity of making
a representation against the order of detention
(b) have no right of making representation against
the order of detention
(c) have a
right to make representation only after 3 months
(d) have a
right to make representation aftěr 6
months
126. Preventive
detention is a permanent feature in India while in United States or in United Kingdom
it is known in :
(a) Peace
time
(b) War time only
(c) in peace as well as war time
(d) unknown to U.S.A. and U.K.
127.The
Preventive Detention Act, 1950 was passed by the Parliament which constituted
the law, of preventive detention was a temporary actexpired in :
(a) 1959
(b) 1969
(c) 1979
(d) 1977
128.
The framers of our Constitution incorporated the preventive detention:
(a) to
save the infant Republic from the inroads ofany such subversive elements
(b) to
handle with the freedom fighters
(c) to tackle the situation arises from
partitions
(d) All the above
129. The revival of anarchist forces obliged
the parliament to a new act of preventive detention known as Maintenance of
Internal Security Act in :
(a) 1969
(b) 1971
(c) 1973
(d) 1975
130.
The Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971 popularly known as MISA was repealed
in
(a) 1977
(b) 1978
(c) 1979
(d) 1980
181. In 1974, Parliament passed the Conservation
of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (commonly known
as COFEPOSA) as an economic adjunct of the MISA with aimed at :
(a) anti-social activities like Smuggling,
racketing inforeign exchange and the like
(b) to
curb the terrorist activities
{ę) to tackle with the problems of Punjab
(d) to
meet with the challenge of terrorist on Pakistan Border,
132.
Power of Preventive detention has been further conferred on Central and State
Governments tosafeguard defence and security of the Country and to maintain
public order, ond essential supplies and services by enacting the :
(a)
National Security Act, 1980
(b) Prevention of Black-marketing and Maintaintenance
of Essential CommoditiesAct, 1980 Of Supplies
(c) both (a) and(b)
(d) None of the above
| 133.
TheLegislative Powers to enact has been granted to:
(a) The
Union only
(b) The
State only
(c) The
Union as well as States
(d) President of India
133.law
of Preventive detention of the Constitution before:
(a) Any
Court
(b)
District Courts
(c) High
Courts
(d)
Supreme Court Or the High Courts
135. Article 23 of the Constitution prohibits
:
(a)
Slavery
(b)
traffic in Women or children
(c) forced
labour of any form
(d) All the above Similar to beggar
136.hazardous
employment :
(a)
Article 19(b) Article 23
(c)
Article 24(d) Article 28
138.
What age has been fixed by the Constitution for prohibition of employment in
hazardous factories or mines :
(a)
Children below 12years
(b) Children below 14 years
(d)
Children below 19years
(c) charitable purposes
139..
Freedom of conscience and freedom to profess, practice and propage his The
Indian citizens "have been granted tỏ .
(b) Aliens
andforeigners only
(c) The
Indian citizen
(d) Alien enemy
as well
aliens/foreigners
140..
Which among th•• "Propagationd aretrue with the
word with the provisions of the Child
Labour(Prohibition and Regulation) Act providing for compensation employment of
their parents/guardian andtheir education
(a) M.C. Mehta v/s Stateof Tamil Nadu – 1991
(b) Bandhua Mukti Morchav/s Union of India –
1997
(c) In both the above cases
(d) neither of the above case
141.
which Articles of our Constitution reflects the secular state :
(a)
Article 25
(b) Article 28
(c)
Preamble along with Articles from 25 to 28
(d)
Article 26 141.
142.India,
under the Constitution, is a "Secular State" that is state which
observes an attitude of :
(a) neutrality and impartially towards all
religions
(b) partiality towards a particular religions
(c) partiality towards all kind of religions
(d) partiality towards Hindu religion only
142,
which among the following statement srefer to secular nature of the state :
(a) there
shall be no 'state religion' in India
(b) state will not compel any citizen to pay
any taxes for promotion or maintenance of any particular religion
(c) no religious instruction shall be provided
in any educational institution wholly provided by the State
(d) All the above are the features of the
secular state in India
143.
Every person in India is guaranteed the freedom of conscience and freedom to :
(a) not to
profess, practice and propagate his ownreligion
(b) to profess, practice and propagate his own
religion
(c) to profess, practice and propagate only Hindu
religion
(d) to profess, practice and propagate only
Muslim religion
144.
Every person is guaranteed the freedom of conscience and freedom to practice
and propagate of his own religion subjects. to the condition,
(a) restriction imposed by the state in the
interest of publics |order, morality and health|
(b) to
regulate or restrictions made by the state relating to any , económic,
financial, political or other secular activity which|-health against public
order, moral may be associated with
religious practice |-
(c) to measure
for social reform
d) None of
the above
145..
The mass of citizens shall no longer have any guaranteed right to compensation
if his property isacquired or requisitioned and the Legislature shall have no
constitutional obligation to provide for payment of any solatium to the
expropriated owner, some exceptions to this general position are allowed by the
44th Amendment in case of acquisition :
a) If the
property acquired belongs to an educational institution established and
administered by a minority, the Law of acquisition must provide for such
compensation as would not abrogate the right of a minority to establish and
administer educational institution. If the state chooses to acquire a minority
educational institution is must after full market value or adequate
compensation
(b) If the state seeks to acquire the land
which is personally cultivated by the owner and such land does not exceed the
statutory ceiling, the state must pay to such owner full market value of his
land
(c) Both above (a) and (b) the two exceptions
to the general principles were allowed by 44th Amendment
(d) None
of the above exceptions were arranged by the constitutional amendment
158.
The power of issue writs for the enforcement of the Fundamental Rights is given
by the Constitution to the :
(a) Supreme Court under Article 32 only
(b) High Court under Article 226 only
(c) Both Supreme Court under Article 32 and
High Courts of States under Article 226
(d) Any
Court or tribunals
159. The Fundamental Rights are guaranteed by
the Constitution :
(a)
against the action of the Executive only
(b) against the action of the legislature only
(c) not
only against the action of the executive but also against that of the
legislature
(d) None of the above
160. A
constitutional remedy for the enforcement of the Fundamental Rights included in
Part III and the right to bring such proceedings before the Supreme Court is
itself a Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Article :
(a)
Article 12
(b)
Article ! 13
(c)
Article 32
(d)
Article 35
161.
Which among the following statement is true :
(a) Power
of the High Courts to issue writs in wider than that of Supreme Court
(b) Power of the Supreme Court to issue writs
is wider than that of High Courts
(c) High
Court can not issue writs against violation of Fundamental Rights
(d)
Supreme Court can issue writs for the redress of any injury even other than
fundament rights or illegality owing to contravention of the ordinary law
162.
The Supreme Court under Article 32 has the power to issue writs only for the purpose of enforcement of the
Fundamental Rights whereas a High Court under Article 226 :
(a) has
power to issue writs not only for the purpose of enforcement of fundamental
rights but also for the redress of any other injury or illegality owing to
contravention of the ordinary law (b) has power to issue writs only when injury
or illegality is caused owing to contravention of the ordinary law
(c) has no
power to issue any kinds of writ against violation of fundamental rights ,
(d) None
of the above
163. By
which writ the court secures the body of a person who has been imprisoned to be
brought before itself to obtain knowledge of the reason why he has been
imprisoned and to set free if there is no lawful justification for the imprisonment
(a) Writ
of habeas corpus
(b) Writ
of mandamus
(c) Writ of Prohibition
(d) Writ
of Certiorari
164. In
which of the following circumstances the writ of habeas corpus can not be
issued earlier by High Courts or Supreme Court :
(a) To secure the release of a person who has
been imprisoned by a court of law on a criminal charge
(b) To
interfere with a proceedings for contempt by a court ofrecord or by Parliament
(c) where the person against whom the writ is
issued or detained person is not within , the jurisdiction of court
(d) All the above
165. In
what circumstances the writ of 'Mandamus' is being issued :
(a)
whenever a public officer or a government has done some act which violates the
fundamental rights of a person
(b) in a cases where there is an alternative
remedy for redress of injury complained of
(c)
whenever a private limited company not performing the duties whatever assign to
them
(d) In all
the above circumstances
166. In
which case/cases the writ of mandamus Can not be issued:
(a) To
enforce the performance of astatutory duty where a public officer has got a
power conferredby the constitution Or a
Statute
(b) To
compel any person to perform his public duty where the duty is imposed by the
constitution of astatute or statutory instrument
(c) To
compel a court orjudicial tribunal to exercise its jurisdiction when it has
refused to exercise is
(d) To
direct a public official or Governmentto enforce a law which is
unconstitutional
167.
The writ of mandamus will not begranted against the following persons :
(a) The
President
(b) The
Governor
(c)
Private individual
(d) All
the above
168. By
which writ theSupreme Court or a High Court compel ịnferior Çourts to keep themselves within the limits of their,
jurisdiction :
(a) Habeas
Corpus
(b)
Mandamus
(c)
Prohibition
(d)
Certiorari
169.
The writ of prohibition differs from the writ of mandamus :
(a) While
mandamus commands activity, prohibition commands in activity
(b) While
mandamus is available not only against judicial authorities but also against administrative
authorities, Prohibition is only against judicial or quasi-judicial authorities
,
(c) Where
excess ofjurisdiction is apparent on the face of Proceedings, a writ of
prohibition be issuedwhile writ of mandamus is issued to direct public official
or govt. to
enforce a
constitutional or Statutory law
(d) All
the above
170.
Which of the following pairs of writs have been issued to censure the jurisdiction of an inferior court of Tribunal
is properly exercised and that it does not usurp the jurisdiction which it does
not possess :
(a) Habeas
Corpus & Mandamus
(b) Mandamus &Prohibition
(c) Prohibition & Certiorari
(d)
Certiorari & Quo-warranto
171.
The conditions necessary for the issue of the writ of certiorari is/are :
(a) There
should be a tribunal or officers having legal authority to determine questions affecting
rights of Subjects and having duty to act judicially
(b) Such tribunal or officer must have acted
without jurisdiction or in excess of legal authority vested in such
quasi-judicial authority or in contravention of the rulers of natural justice
or there is an error apparent on the face of the record
(c) Where the court is not properly
constituted, that is to say, where persons who are not qualified to sit on the
tribunal have sat on it and pronounced the decision complained against
(d) In all
the above conditions In which writ the court enquires into the legality of the
claim 172.which a party asserts to a public office and to puts him from its
enjoyment if the claim be not well founded i.e. the public has an interest to
see that an unlawful claimant does not usurp a public office :
(a) Quo Warranto
(b)
Certiorari
(c)
Mandamus
(d) Habeas
Corpus
173.Some
of the Fundamental Rights are not available to the members of Armed Forces,
Police Forces, or Intelligence organisation. Who reserves their right to decide
the same:
(a) The Parliament
(b) The
President
(c) The
Defence Minister
(d) The President in consultation with the
Chief Justice
174.Parliament
shall have the power to modify the members of Armed Forces, Police Forces or
Intelligence organisation so as:
(a) They are not the citizen of Indian
(b) To ensure proper discharge of their duties
and maintenance of discipline among them
(c) They are associated with to ensure
internal or external security of the state
(d) They are generally foreigners/aliens
175.The
Fundamental Rights guaranteed by the Constitution will remain suspended, while
a proclamation of Emergency under Article 352 made by :
(a)
President of India
(b)
Parliament|
(c) Chief
Justice of Supreme Court
(d) Prime
Minister
176.Is
there any constitution protection guaranteed against the Executive or
Legislative authorities during the operation of proclamation of Emergency ?
(a) No
remedy for acts done against citizen during the period of proclamation in
violating of rights
(b) Yes
there is constitution protection
(c) It depends citizen to decide
(d) None of the above
177.Which
among the following rights remain intact even during the operation of the
proclamation of Emergency ?
(a) Freedom of Speech & Expression
(b) Right to Constitutional Remedy
(c) Right to Life and Personal Liberty
(d) Right
to form an Associations
178.Which
among the following rights guaranteed under the Constitution is absolute and
does not admit any exception;
(a) Right
to freedom ofpress granted under Art. 19(1)(a)
(b)
Prohibition of Employment of children below 14years in a hazardous factories or
mines guaranteed under Article 24 of the Constitution
(c) prohibition of Discrimination on the ground
of religion, race, Caste & Sex, place of birth guaranteed under Art. 15
(d) No
right is absolute under Indian Constitution
179.Under
which Article provisions of Fundamental Duties incorporated :
(a)
Article 50(b) Article 51
(c)
Article 51A(d) Article 52
180.In
which part the part of Fundamental Duties have been incorporated :
(a) Part
III(b) Part IV
(c) Part
IVA(d) Part V
181.How
many numbers of total Fundamental Duties?
(a)
Five(b) Six
(c) Nine(d)
Ten
182.How
the Fundamental Duties are being enforced?
(a) There
is no provisions in the Constitution for direct enforcement nor any sanction to
prevent their violation
(b) The
High Courts have been granted power to enforce the fundamental duties
(c) The
Supreme Court has been granted powers to enforce the fundamental duties
(d) Any of
the court may issue directions for enforcement of fundamental duties
183. To
protect the sovereignty,Unity and Integrity of India isthe :
(a)
Fundamental Rights of the Citizen
(b)
Fundamental Duties of the Citizen
(c)
Directive Principles of State policy
(d) None
of the above
184.
Which among the following is not the Fundamental Duties :
(a) to
abide by the constitution and respect the National Flag and the National Anthem
(b) to
defame the country
(c) to
promote the spirit of common brotherhood among all the people of India
(d) to
develop the scientific temper and spirit of inquiry
185.
The Fundamental Duties has been inserted by the :
(a) 24th
constitutional amendments
(b) 42nd constitutional amendments
(c) 43rd Constitutional amendments
(d) 44th
constitutional annendments